December 28. 2009 by Dick.

The ups and downs of the decade. We made a bunch of great closeout deals but this column has room for only a few. Here are the top nine of 2009:

The downside: We may not have changed many of the Old Guard of pols but we surely did change how they do business inside the Beltway. They no longer throw billions of We the OverTaxedPeople’s dollars at problems.
The upside: Now they throw trillions.

Hoo wee. That’s change we can believe in!

---

The downside: President Obama (praise be his name) stole General Motors from its rightful owners (that would be small stockholders like thee and me) and put Ed “I Came from the Phone Company So I Don’t Know Anything about Cars” Whitacre in charge.
The upside: Thanks to the soybean lobby, your new Chevy Condescension will be the first model to come with tofubags instead of the dangerous and expensive airbags as well as the new OnStar-by-AT&T. Rumors that OnStar service will also be available on your iPhone have not proven out.

---

The downside: Democrats were appalled when President Obama nominated Senator Judd Gregg, R-NH, as his Secretary of Commerce. The U.S. Department of Commerce fosters, promotes, and develops business and industry. Democrats called Senator Gregg “too pro-business.”
The upside: Caroline Cartwright of Great Britain was arrested for noise levels that ranged between 30 and 40 decibels, with some squeaks “being 47 decibels” during sex. Bird calls are generally 44 dB.

---

The downside: Congress passed without reading a $787 billion “stimulus package” that, instead of stimulating We the OverTaxedPeople who provided the money, all went for swine flu shots to bankers. Vermont had a looming two hundred million dollar budget deficit so the Democratically controlled legislature there decided to spend three hundred million dollars of its portion of that G.R.A.F.T. Act windfall to “stabilize” its budget. Since that wasn’t enough, the Democratically controlled legislature also raised taxes by $24 million dollars in order to make up for the revenue shortfall.
The upside: The Nobel Committee awarded the Peace Prize posthumously to Michael Jackson.

---

The downside: The Environmental Protection Agency ruled that political science trumps actual science as a danger to human health and to the environment.
The upside: Millions of people flocked to Al Gore’s house in the Belle Meade neighborhood of Nashville where his Christmas decorationsand the upturned smiling faces were photographed from the International Space Station.

---

The downside: Just two years ago, world leaders of 193 countries pledged to reverse the course of climate change in Denmark this year. When the hot air cleared in Copenhagen this month, there were two inches of snow on the ground, two pounds of faked “global warming” emails, and $200 billion dollars in a Global Relief fund. Guess who they want to pick up the tab?
The upside: Each world leader flew to Denmark in one or more private airliners thus reducing the worldwide surplus of Jet A and Jet A-1 petroleum-based fuels.

---

The downside: In a strange coincidence, the International Olympic Committee also meeting in Copenhagen voted not to award the 2016 Summer Olympics to Chicago for fear that a fire in former Governor Rod Blagojevich’s hair might undermine the new “pay to play” Olympic game category.
The upside: The one billion dollar Cash for Clunkers program which cost three billion dollars left an estimated 643,000 1974 Ford Pintos on Illinois and Michigan highways as entry level vehicles for migrant farmers and high school students.

---

The downside: The Environmental Protection Agency said it will increase the percentage of ethanol in gasoline to 15% by next June. Ethanol producers and most newspapers say the higher blends will increase fuel economy, create more jobs in the industry, and increase government payments to ethanol producers by $787 billion.
The upside: The Social Security Administration announced that since Congress will lock fuel prices at $4.599 per gallon through 2012, the Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) can remain fixed at 0% for the same period.

---

The downside: The U.S. economy has shed 15.4 million or more jobs including those once held by Rufus, Biff, and my wife, Anne.
The upside: The $787 billion “stimulus package” has created an estimated 643,000 brand new jobs (roughly identical to the number of saved 1974 Ford Pintos). All the new employees are dedicated to maintaining the White House website that tracks new jobs.

We have, as a nation, spent the entire decade unwilling to learn from our mistakes. Change We Can Believe In! certainly changed all of that and we are this >||< close to ObamaCare to prove it.

You can’t make this stuff up. Happy New Decade, everyone!

Posted in Government Motors, What? Are They Nuts?, ObamaCare, History, Global Warming, Newspaper "Science", Banking, Science (not-so-real), Politics & News, Society, Business, Cars, Random Access | 3 Comments »

May 31. 2009 by Special Contributor.

Arlen Specter (D-PA) is the correspondent’s senior United States Senator from Pennsylvania.

Dear Senator Specter:

I will make this as short as possible.

As of Monday, May 24, just 6 days ago, the federal government was supposed to get 50% of General Motors new stock, the UAW 39%, the bondholders 10% and the original stockholders the remaining 1%. (I bought GM stock based on that.)

This was sure never to fly as the bondholders would expect the courts to give them more so it was a “deal” designed to ensure bankruptcy.

On Friday, the deal suddenly changed. Now the UAW gets 17.5%, the Feds get 72.5%, and the bondholders still get only 10%, albeit with warrants to buy 15% more stock. Common stock becomes pure trash.

Why did the UAW ownership drop? Did the UAW agree because they thought that the additional money would go to the bondholders, potentially averting a bankruptcy that destroys the value of their own common stock?

I ask you, Senator Specter: DO YOU KNOW?

If you do not know. do you know anyone who does know? There hasn’t been a word breathed in the press, so I assume the media must not know (or doesn’t care since a bankruptcy would sell more copy. Even the Wall Street Journal thinks the government “sweetened the offer” to the bondholders (at the same time the government upped its own holding by almost a third, a little fact that keeps slipping through the cracks.)

If you do not know, why is this bankruptcy allowed to proceed without a timeout for hearings, so the executive branch can explain under oath what the hell they are doing to the American people?

A bankruptcy will insure that the GM stock in millions of 401Ks (actually already “201Ks” or even “101Ks” ) around the country can NEVER recover their value. Without a bankruptcy, they could eventually recover.

This government takeover leaves millions of people’s retirement prospects destroyed, including many who are already retired and unable to start over. That includes the UAW members who accepted a smaller share of the new company plus non-union GM employees, dealer employees, in addition to mutual funds that are held by people all over the country. A large number of Pennsylvania retirees and stockholders are your own constituents and voters.

I ask you, Senator Specter: What is the benefit to destroying the common stock? Why destroy business ownership if the deals in place let the GM stock in those 401Ks recover?

Is it the business of this government and the political party you joined to insure that people can never retire?

I ask you, Senator Specter: What will the impact of the bankruptcy be on the healthcare programs for GM employees and retirees? We are not just talking UAW line workers, but all GM employees, union, non-union, and professional. Is it the business of this government and the political party you joined to make sure people have poor healthcare?

Or is it the intention of this government and the political party you joined to build demand for nationalized healthcare!

I ask you, Senator Specter: Wouldn’t such an approach be fraudulent?

Ralph Nader, whom I historically have despised for the fraud he perpetrated with Unsafe at Any Speed, published an editorial in Wall Street Journal on Friday. I laud him for raising the issues and for pointing out that IT IS NOT TOO LATE TO AVOID THE BANKRUPTCY OF GENERAL MOTORS.

It will take more than that lone voice in the wilderness.

We need a major voice in the Senate to call for a time out and for hearings to that the American Public can understand what is being done in their name. YOU MUST DO THIS TODAY.

Thank you.

(signed)
Bob Post, registered voter

Footnote:
Arlen Specter (previously D-, then R-, and now D-PA) is the correspondent’s senior United States Senator from Pennsylvania. Senator Specter had been a member of the Democratic Party before switching to the Republicans to win a campaign for district attorney. Elected to the Senate in 1980, Specter rejoined the Democratic Party this year when he discovered he would lose his upcoming Republican primary.

Posted in Government Motors, Guest Posts, Banking, Business, Politics & News | 2 Comments »

May 29. 2009 by Dick.

The pundits all expect that General Motors will file for bankruptcy protection on Monday.

Why?

We (used to) assume that people act to preserve their economic interests. Government acts to preserve the governors.

Given the horse puckey that has already gone on in the Wall Street-Pennsylvania Avenue continuum, I think I have it figured out why Barack Obama wants to bankrupt me:

• 1. The Democrats need to generate demand for universal health care. Imagine that.
• 2. Big bond holders bought credit swaps, the financial innovations that insure debt. Credit swaps pay off only in a formal default. Imagine that.
• 3. Congress needs to shore up Social Security; all the calls to strip that pot of gold from their hands scared them silly. Imagine that.
• 4. The Administration needs to be able to say, “See, this is what happens when you sell gas guzzlers; you go bankrupt.” They are already saying that about the Dodge Hemi. Imagine that.

1. One might think demand for universal health care would be, well, universal. Oddly it isn’t. That said, if half the country suddenly loses its benefits when the bankruptcy domino train rolls through, Democrats hope that changes. A GM bankruptcy almost guarantees that all those workers jump on the Medicare bandwagon.

2. Credit swaps pay off only in a formal default. Look at which Wall Street player whisper in President Obama’s ear to see how financial policy is formulated. A GM bankruptcy could guarantee the credit default.

3. Congress is not afraid that the Social Security will be bankrupt by 2050. Congress is afraid that the Social Security will become irrelevant within their elected terms. Congress absolutely cannot give up that “revenue” stream. A GM bankruptcy guarantees the Social Security revenue stream.

A GM bankruptcy means autoworkers now have 201Ks because the stock in their (former) 401Ks tanked. If GM shares are not wiped out and the company recovers, the autoworkers’ 401K’s will recover eventually. A GM bankruptcy means autoworkers and everyone else with GM stock in a retirement account is more than ever dependent on Social Security. I hope the UAW has finally discovered that a boughten politician doesn’t stay bought. And I hope that you, gentle reader, understand that bankrupting GM decimates my own personal retirement account.

4. Finally, the Administration needs to eliminate the popular gas guzzlers to push forward their Consumer’s Union vision of the perfect car: the 1985 Yugo. After all, it is not right to sell ten million popular cars and trucks. It is only right (should that be left?) to this Administration to sell about half a million Yugos. Or Fiats. A GM bankruptcy guarantees there won’t be anything else sold.

“Those cars are ugly,” Rufus said about the looming Chrysler-Fiat deal. “Americans may not remember all the problem cars Fiat made the last time they were sold here, but Americans don’t buy ugly.”

I dunno. The Democrats sold us first Al Gore and now Barack Obama so perhaps they can sell us Flea Flops, too. But I’ll betcha not one Congress Critter buys one. According to the Intert00b, Far Green darling, multi-millionaire Mr. Gore owns a giant 10 mpg Ford Expedition.

Posted in Government Motors, ObamaCare, Banking, Business, Politics & News, Random Access | 2 Comments »