<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for No Puffin Perspective™</title>
	<link>http://blog.dickharper.com</link>
	<description>Most excellent shines and whines</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fix &#8216;R Right Up by Dick</title>
		<link>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/02/01/fixed/#comment-11095</link>
		<author>Dick</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/02/01/fixed/#comment-11095</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Christian. The RSS subscriptions include Live bookmarks, Bloglines, My Yahoo, and Google. Click here for more info:
http://blog.dickharper.com/feed/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Christian. The RSS subscriptions include Live bookmarks, Bloglines, My Yahoo, and Google. Click here for more info:<br />
<a href="http://blog.dickharper.com/feed/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.dickharper.com/feed/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fix &#8216;R Right Up by Christian louboutin sale</title>
		<link>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/02/01/fixed/#comment-11082</link>
		<author>Christian louboutin sale</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/02/01/fixed/#comment-11082</guid>
		<description>It's so lucky for me to find your blog! So shocking and great! Just one suggestion: It will be better and easier to follow if your blog can offer rrs subscription service</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s so lucky for me to find your blog! So shocking and great! Just one suggestion: It will be better and easier to follow if your blog can offer rrs subscription service</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Theatrical by George Poleczech</title>
		<link>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/03/01/theatrical/#comment-10714</link>
		<author>George Poleczech</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/03/01/theatrical/#comment-10714</guid>
		<description>I did not see where Marsha voted for lights at Wrigley Field.  Mebbe she was off sick that day.
-- George
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did not see where Marsha voted for lights at Wrigley Field.  Mebbe she was off sick that day.<br />
&#8211; George</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Theatrical by mickeywhite</title>
		<link>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/03/01/theatrical/#comment-10635</link>
		<author>mickeywhite</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 03:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/03/01/theatrical/#comment-10635</guid>
		<description>Marsha Blackburn Voted FOR: 
Omnibus Appropriations, Special Education, Global AIDS Initiative, Job Training, Unemployment Benefits, Labor-HHS-Education Appropriations, Agriculture Appropriations, U.S.-Singapore Trade, U.S.-Chile Trade, Supplemental Spending for Iraq &#38; Afghanistan, Prescription Drug Benefit, Child Nutrition Programs, Surface Transportation, Job Training and Worker Services, Agriculture Appropriations, Foreign Aid, Vocational/Technical Training, Supplemental Appropriations, UN “Reforms.” Patriot Act Reauthorization, CAFTA, Katrina Hurricane-relief Appropriations, Head Start Funding, Line-item Rescission, Oman Trade Agreement, Military Tribunals, Electronic Surveillance, Head Start Funding, COPS Funding, Funding the REAL ID Act (National ID), Foreign Intelligence Surveillance, Thought Crimes “Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act, Peru Free Trade Agreement, Economic Stimulus, Farm Bill (Veto Override), Warrantless Searches, Employee Verification Program, Body Imaging Screening.

Marsha Blackburn Voted AGAINST:
Ban on UN Contributions, eliminate Millennium Challenge Account, WTO Withdrawal, UN Dues Decrease, Defunding the NAIS, Iran Military Operations defunding Iraq Troop Withdrawal, congress authorization of Iran Military Operations.


Marsha Blackburn is my Congressman.
See her unconstitutional votes at :
http://tinyurl.com/qhayna
Mickey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marsha Blackburn Voted FOR:<br />
Omnibus Appropriations, Special Education, Global AIDS Initiative, Job Training, Unemployment Benefits, Labor-HHS-Education Appropriations, Agriculture Appropriations, U.S.-Singapore Trade, U.S.-Chile Trade, Supplemental Spending for Iraq &amp; Afghanistan, Prescription Drug Benefit, Child Nutrition Programs, Surface Transportation, Job Training and Worker Services, Agriculture Appropriations, Foreign Aid, Vocational/Technical Training, Supplemental Appropriations, UN “Reforms.” Patriot Act Reauthorization, CAFTA, Katrina Hurricane-relief Appropriations, Head Start Funding, Line-item Rescission, Oman Trade Agreement, Military Tribunals, Electronic Surveillance, Head Start Funding, COPS Funding, Funding the REAL ID Act (National ID), Foreign Intelligence Surveillance, Thought Crimes “Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act, Peru Free Trade Agreement, Economic Stimulus, Farm Bill (Veto Override), Warrantless Searches, Employee Verification Program, Body Imaging Screening.</p>
<p>Marsha Blackburn Voted AGAINST:<br />
Ban on UN Contributions, eliminate Millennium Challenge Account, WTO Withdrawal, UN Dues Decrease, Defunding the NAIS, Iran Military Operations defunding Iraq Troop Withdrawal, congress authorization of Iran Military Operations.</p>
<p>Marsha Blackburn is my Congressman.<br />
See her unconstitutional votes at :<br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/qhayna" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/qhayna</a><br />
Mickey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Theatrical by George Poleczech</title>
		<link>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/03/01/theatrical/#comment-10616</link>
		<author>George Poleczech</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/03/01/theatrical/#comment-10616</guid>
		<description>Support the Arts with taxes?  I don't think so.

Who gets to decide the subject matter?  Who gets to decide what is classic and what is not?  Who gets to decide what is culture?  Who gets to decide what is ART?  

As my brother Horsch Poleczech once said, "Culture is something that grows in a lab, and Art is the guy who grows it."  I think Horsch heard it from Henny Youngman.

If we can vote a tax-paid salary for a tubby cello player in a tux, why not for a bellied C/W fiddle player in jeans and Stetson?  

If a municipal symphony orchestra leader can get tax money for waving his baton at a(n) euphonic group of eighty or ninety, then why not bank roll the traveling Andre Rieu (or is it Reiu) whose apollo-like face and gracious mane floods our *You Tube* click-links?  

If a lithe gal in a tu-tu gets taxpayer support, why not one is a G-string and tassles?  Is bump and grind any less ergonomic than leap and glide?  Same kinetic energy.

We have seen this kind of open-ended selectiveness with snowboarding in the Olympics, etc etc, and it seems to work, eh?  So, let's go for it.  Get my point yet?

I jest, of course.  When we start using the clamorous, socialist logic of moderates to mandate how citizens must (must) support certain selective undertakings, it is always those doing the clamouring who decide the ground rules: then we begin to snowboard down that slippery slope and end up tripping over our tassles and G-strings.

Next think you know they will be telling us we have to bail out the auto and mortgage industry. Or we must fund the ACLU.  Where will it end?

I would have addressed the other issues, but I don't know anything about politics.  "I just know what I like."

 -- George</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Support the Arts with taxes?  I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
<p>Who gets to decide the subject matter?  Who gets to decide what is classic and what is not?  Who gets to decide what is culture?  Who gets to decide what is ART?  </p>
<p>As my brother Horsch Poleczech once said, &#8220;Culture is something that grows in a lab, and Art is the guy who grows it.&#8221;  I think Horsch heard it from Henny Youngman.</p>
<p>If we can vote a tax-paid salary for a tubby cello player in a tux, why not for a bellied C/W fiddle player in jeans and Stetson?  </p>
<p>If a municipal symphony orchestra leader can get tax money for waving his baton at a(n) euphonic group of eighty or ninety, then why not bank roll the traveling Andre Rieu (or is it Reiu) whose apollo-like face and gracious mane floods our *You Tube* click-links?  </p>
<p>If a lithe gal in a tu-tu gets taxpayer support, why not one is a G-string and tassles?  Is bump and grind any less ergonomic than leap and glide?  Same kinetic energy.</p>
<p>We have seen this kind of open-ended selectiveness with snowboarding in the Olympics, etc etc, and it seems to work, eh?  So, let&#8217;s go for it.  Get my point yet?</p>
<p>I jest, of course.  When we start using the clamorous, socialist logic of moderates to mandate how citizens must (must) support certain selective undertakings, it is always those doing the clamouring who decide the ground rules: then we begin to snowboard down that slippery slope and end up tripping over our tassles and G-strings.</p>
<p>Next think you know they will be telling us we have to bail out the auto and mortgage industry. Or we must fund the ACLU.  Where will it end?</p>
<p>I would have addressed the other issues, but I don&#8217;t know anything about politics.  &#8220;I just know what I like.&#8221;</p>
<p> &#8212; George</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AGW by Dick</title>
		<link>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/02/24/agw/#comment-10615</link>
		<author>Dick</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/02/24/agw/#comment-10615</guid>
		<description>They drank the Kool-Aid:
http://tinyurl.com/yk265vc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They drank the Kool-Aid:<br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/yk265vc" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/yk265vc</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Guilty! by Dick</title>
		<link>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/02/22/guilty/#comment-10412</link>
		<author>Dick</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/02/22/guilty/#comment-10412</guid>
		<description>Now that Albert Perry has retired, I believe there is not one single solitary nuclear engineer in the Vermont Legislature. Not one. Even if they had the final reports about nuclear power safety, there is not one single solitary Vermont Legislator qualified to make decisions about Vermont Yankee. Not one. &lt;strong&gt;Nonetheless, 26 of 30 Vermont Senators took their thimbleful of scientific experience and voted for political theater.&lt;/strong&gt;

To paraphrase a former President, &lt;em&gt;the trouble with our legislative friends is not that they’re ignorant; it’s just that they know so much that isn’t so.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that Albert Perry has retired, I believe there is not one single solitary nuclear engineer in the Vermont Legislature. Not one. Even if they had the final reports about nuclear power safety, there is not one single solitary Vermont Legislator qualified to make decisions about Vermont Yankee. Not one. <strong>Nonetheless, 26 of 30 Vermont Senators took their thimbleful of scientific experience and voted for political theater.</strong></p>
<p>To paraphrase a former President, <em>the trouble with our legislative friends is not that they’re ignorant; it’s just that they know so much that isn’t so.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Guilty! by George Poleczech</title>
		<link>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/02/22/guilty/#comment-10341</link>
		<author>George Poleczech</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/02/22/guilty/#comment-10341</guid>
		<description>In spite of our Constitutional proclamations of *innocent until proved guilty*, the demand for bail posting belies our opinon that the accused is innocent.  Doesn't it?

And in cases where sex and children are spoken of in the same document of accusation, we are conditioned (by media perhaps) to believe the child -- even though it has been shown many times to be unreliable, either on purpose by the child or from manipulation by an overly eager and avid advocate professional. 

Assuming the coach and the corrections officer were/are one in the same, I would not have envied Ms Ace's job in making a decision; and I bet she caught flack from both sides. But in my opinion, he should have been replaced as soon as he was found to be leaking Tritium. 

 -- George</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In spite of our Constitutional proclamations of *innocent until proved guilty*, the demand for bail posting belies our opinon that the accused is innocent.  Doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>And in cases where sex and children are spoken of in the same document of accusation, we are conditioned (by media perhaps) to believe the child &#8212; even though it has been shown many times to be unreliable, either on purpose by the child or from manipulation by an overly eager and avid advocate professional. </p>
<p>Assuming the coach and the corrections officer were/are one in the same, I would not have envied Ms Ace&#8217;s job in making a decision; and I bet she caught flack from both sides. But in my opinion, he should have been replaced as soon as he was found to be leaking Tritium. </p>
<p> &#8212; George</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Guilty! by Bob Post</title>
		<link>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/02/22/guilty/#comment-10319</link>
		<author>Bob Post</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 04:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/02/22/guilty/#comment-10319</guid>
		<description>I suspected Lorraine was a liar. But it was purely that: suspicion, and I held that clearly in mind until convincing evidence one way or the other was available.

I suspect Vermont Yankee needs a lot of work, as old as it is. I suspect Vermonters are SCREWED if it doesn't get that work and then remain online. I KNOW they would deserve every bit of the screwing they will surely get if they let a bunch of self-serving politicians and "environmentalists" make the decision to shut down a potentially perfectly good power plant (assuming it is such.) But I hope they pull it off --- might be a good object lesson for other states in the Union.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspected Lorraine was a liar. But it was purely that: suspicion, and I held that clearly in mind until convincing evidence one way or the other was available.</p>
<p>I suspect Vermont Yankee needs a lot of work, as old as it is. I suspect Vermonters are SCREWED if it doesn&#8217;t get that work and then remain online. I KNOW they would deserve every bit of the screwing they will surely get if they let a bunch of self-serving politicians and &#8220;environmentalists&#8221; make the decision to shut down a potentially perfectly good power plant (assuming it is such.) But I hope they pull it off &#8212; might be a good object lesson for other states in the Union.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What? The World Isn&#8217;t Flat? by George Poleczech</title>
		<link>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/02/15/flat/#comment-9997</link>
		<author>George Poleczech</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/02/15/flat/#comment-9997</guid>
		<description>I would like to comment on the excellence of this piece.  So, I have.  Thank you.

 -- George Poleczech</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to comment on the excellence of this piece.  So, I have.  Thank you.</p>
<p> &#8212; George Poleczech</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A (Baker&#8217;s) Dozen Reasons to be Left by Dino Russell</title>
		<link>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/02/08/liberal-1/#comment-9922</link>
		<author>Dino Russell</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/02/08/liberal-1/#comment-9922</guid>
		<description>This is making the email rounds again. It seems appropriate:

----------
I voted Democrat because I love the fact that I can now
marry whatever I want.  I've decided to marry my horse. 

I voted Democrat because I believe oil companies'
profits of 4% on a gallon of gas are obscene but the
government taxing the same gallon of gas at 15% isn't.  

I voted Democrat because I believe the government will do a
better job of spending the money I earn than I would.   

I voted Democrat because freedom of speech is fine as long
as nobody is offended by it.    

I voted Democrat because when we pull out of  Iraq  I trust
that the bad guys will stop what they're doing because
they now think we're good people.   

I voted Democrat because I'm way too irresponsible to
own a gun, and I know that my local police are all I need to
protect me from murderers and thieves.   

I voted Democrat because I believe that people who
can't tell us if it will rain on Friday can tell us that
the polar ice caps will melt away in ten years if I
don't start driving a Prius.   

I voted Democrat because I'm not concerned about the
slaughter of millions of babies so long as we keep all death
row inmates alive.   

I voted Democrat because I believe that business should not
be allowed to make profits for themselves.  They need to
break even and give the rest away to the government for
redistribution as THEY see fit.   

I voted Democrat because I believe liberal judges need to
rewrite the Constitution every few days to suit some fringe
kooks who would never get their agendas past the voters.   
----------

"The problem with Socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money." - Margaret Thatcher</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is making the email rounds again. It seems appropriate:</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
I voted Democrat because I love the fact that I can now<br />
marry whatever I want.  I&#8217;ve decided to marry my horse. </p>
<p>I voted Democrat because I believe oil companies&#8217;<br />
profits of 4% on a gallon of gas are obscene but the<br />
government taxing the same gallon of gas at 15% isn&#8217;t.  </p>
<p>I voted Democrat because I believe the government will do a<br />
better job of spending the money I earn than I would.   </p>
<p>I voted Democrat because freedom of speech is fine as long<br />
as nobody is offended by it.    </p>
<p>I voted Democrat because when we pull out of  Iraq  I trust<br />
that the bad guys will stop what they&#8217;re doing because<br />
they now think we&#8217;re good people.   </p>
<p>I voted Democrat because I&#8217;m way too irresponsible to<br />
own a gun, and I know that my local police are all I need to<br />
protect me from murderers and thieves.   </p>
<p>I voted Democrat because I believe that people who<br />
can&#8217;t tell us if it will rain on Friday can tell us that<br />
the polar ice caps will melt away in ten years if I<br />
don&#8217;t start driving a Prius.   </p>
<p>I voted Democrat because I&#8217;m not concerned about the<br />
slaughter of millions of babies so long as we keep all death<br />
row inmates alive.   </p>
<p>I voted Democrat because I believe that business should not<br />
be allowed to make profits for themselves.  They need to<br />
break even and give the rest away to the government for<br />
redistribution as THEY see fit.   </p>
<p>I voted Democrat because I believe liberal judges need to<br />
rewrite the Constitution every few days to suit some fringe<br />
kooks who would never get their agendas past the voters.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>&#8220;The problem with Socialism is that you eventually run out of other people&#8217;s money.&#8221; - Margaret Thatcher</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A (Baker&#8217;s) Dozen Reasons to be Left by George Poleczech</title>
		<link>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/02/08/liberal-1/#comment-9883</link>
		<author>George Poleczech</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/02/08/liberal-1/#comment-9883</guid>
		<description>Dick, this is probably the best thing you have ever plagerized (even if I can't spell it).

Seriousy, I enjoyed it muchly.  Thank you very much for doing it.

 -- George</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dick, this is probably the best thing you have ever plagerized (even if I can&#8217;t spell it).</p>
<p>Seriousy, I enjoyed it muchly.  Thank you very much for doing it.</p>
<p> &#8212; George</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Good Business Plan by George Poleczech</title>
		<link>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/02/05/plan/#comment-9772</link>
		<author>George Poleczech</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 23:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/02/05/plan/#comment-9772</guid>
		<description>Online buying is big business.  I ordered some stuff today and had it sent ot my Sister-in-Law's house because her street is easier to spell.  It will come UPS.

US Pony Express mail system frequently delivers my mail to a woman with similar first and surname as that of Mrs Poleczech's offline name. Our house numbers are the same, and the street name is easily confused if the postal person is in a hurry.  UPS never makes that mistake.

One day there was a car accident about a block from my house.  The wreck had just happened when I drove up, and the driver of the hittee vehicle asked me to call 911 on my cell because her daughter was faint.  I did so -- being careful to give the intersection where the accident occurred.

The 911 operator noted that I was on a cell and demanded my name and home address before she would dispatch a unit.  I willingly complied, and when I saw that a nurse stopped to attend the young woman, I got in my vehicle and drove to the house.  About ten minutes later an EMS unit arrived at my outside gate with a stretcher and all the bag-hanging equipment.  They rang the bell and wanted to know where the injured person was.

The inevitable mix-up had occurred.

I pointed to the wreck about 600 feet away and asked them how them missed seeing it.  The answer was that they came in "the back way" via their GPS. 

(We don't need no steenkin' house number) 

 -- George</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Online buying is big business.  I ordered some stuff today and had it sent ot my Sister-in-Law&#8217;s house because her street is easier to spell.  It will come UPS.</p>
<p>US Pony Express mail system frequently delivers my mail to a woman with similar first and surname as that of Mrs Poleczech&#8217;s offline name. Our house numbers are the same, and the street name is easily confused if the postal person is in a hurry.  UPS never makes that mistake.</p>
<p>One day there was a car accident about a block from my house.  The wreck had just happened when I drove up, and the driver of the hittee vehicle asked me to call 911 on my cell because her daughter was faint.  I did so &#8212; being careful to give the intersection where the accident occurred.</p>
<p>The 911 operator noted that I was on a cell and demanded my name and home address before she would dispatch a unit.  I willingly complied, and when I saw that a nurse stopped to attend the young woman, I got in my vehicle and drove to the house.  About ten minutes later an EMS unit arrived at my outside gate with a stretcher and all the bag-hanging equipment.  They rang the bell and wanted to know where the injured person was.</p>
<p>The inevitable mix-up had occurred.</p>
<p>I pointed to the wreck about 600 feet away and asked them how them missed seeing it.  The answer was that they came in &#8220;the back way&#8221; via their GPS. </p>
<p>(We don&#8217;t need no steenkin&#8217; house number) </p>
<p> &#8212; George</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fix &#8216;R Right Up by George Poleczech</title>
		<link>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/02/01/fixed/#comment-9648</link>
		<author>George Poleczech</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/02/01/fixed/#comment-9648</guid>
		<description>Bubba Brothers have their sequels, and I'm sure everybody has one.  Here in SE Texas, I once took a stick-shift Volvo to Dick 'n Sons (true story) Automotive because they had a nice ad in the phone book.  When I got there I found out that Dick had died some years back, and his sons had sold the business to Morales y Tio (that's Morales and Uncle, for those who are unolingual).  But the sign out front still read Dick 'n Sons. 

The car had a bad rattling noise when I tromped down on the gas, and they told me I had a cracked flywheel and gave me an estimate.  It ain't easy to crack a flywheel on a little four cylinder car, but I  agreed to the bottom line and told them to go ahead; but when they took it out I was standing there, and it was okay.

Either Morales or Tio scratched his head in puzzlement; and when they put it back in and slid everything together and tightened the nuts, the rattling noise was gone.

The same guy shrugged and handed me a bill for one hour of shop time...which was about all it would have taken for them to tighten the nuts in the first place.  I paid it and drove away.

Had I not been there to inspect it, I suspect my flywheel would have succumbed to to the onslaught of a ball peen hammer untill its configuration matched that of the estimated dollar figure.

 -- George</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bubba Brothers have their sequels, and I&#8217;m sure everybody has one.  Here in SE Texas, I once took a stick-shift Volvo to Dick &#8216;n Sons (true story) Automotive because they had a nice ad in the phone book.  When I got there I found out that Dick had died some years back, and his sons had sold the business to Morales y Tio (that&#8217;s Morales and Uncle, for those who are unolingual).  But the sign out front still read Dick &#8216;n Sons. </p>
<p>The car had a bad rattling noise when I tromped down on the gas, and they told me I had a cracked flywheel and gave me an estimate.  It ain&#8217;t easy to crack a flywheel on a little four cylinder car, but I  agreed to the bottom line and told them to go ahead; but when they took it out I was standing there, and it was okay.</p>
<p>Either Morales or Tio scratched his head in puzzlement; and when they put it back in and slid everything together and tightened the nuts, the rattling noise was gone.</p>
<p>The same guy shrugged and handed me a bill for one hour of shop time&#8230;which was about all it would have taken for them to tighten the nuts in the first place.  I paid it and drove away.</p>
<p>Had I not been there to inspect it, I suspect my flywheel would have succumbed to to the onslaught of a ball peen hammer untill its configuration matched that of the estimated dollar figure.</p>
<p> &#8212; George</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When the Numbers Just Don&#8217;t Work by George Poleczech</title>
		<link>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/01/24/numbers/#comment-9565</link>
		<author>George Poleczech</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/01/24/numbers/#comment-9565</guid>
		<description>Well, at that late hour of the morning, enough selectively chosen *random* Obama supporters are awake to answer their phones coherently and justify that a poll has been taken.  After noon would have been better -- in order to cull the incoherent ones -- and then it would have been 100%.

 -- George</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, at that late hour of the morning, enough selectively chosen *random* Obama supporters are awake to answer their phones coherently and justify that a poll has been taken.  After noon would have been better &#8212; in order to cull the incoherent ones &#8212; and then it would have been 100%.</p>
<p> &#8212; George</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Novel Idea! by George Poleczech</title>
		<link>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/01/25/assessment/#comment-9564</link>
		<author>George Poleczech</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/01/25/assessment/#comment-9564</guid>
		<description>Those of us (and few we are) who object to giving even one dime to Haiti relief can take some wee comfort in the knowledge that very, very little of that three billion dollars will actually see the light of day in that geographical rat hole.  Instead, it will continue to fuel the counterproductive machine that has driven Haiti for as long as their citizens have had chickens to sacrifice or bones to toss.

 -- George</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those of us (and few we are) who object to giving even one dime to Haiti relief can take some wee comfort in the knowledge that very, very little of that three billion dollars will actually see the light of day in that geographical rat hole.  Instead, it will continue to fuel the counterproductive machine that has driven Haiti for as long as their citizens have had chickens to sacrifice or bones to toss.</p>
<p> &#8212; George</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maybe Yes, Maybe No by George Poleczech</title>
		<link>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/01/18/yes-no/#comment-9563</link>
		<author>George Poleczech</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/01/18/yes-no/#comment-9563</guid>
		<description>"Should businesses include the expense of taxes when calculating the cost of their goods/services?

Should goods/services include the cost of taxes when their prices are calculated?

PS To both those questions I’d answer yes."

The answer IS yes, and it lies in pure capitalism; but the question should be:  In order to remain solvent, *MUST* businesses include the expense of taxes when their prices are calculated?  etc, etc.

Even Buster would sign off on that.

 -- George</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Should businesses include the expense of taxes when calculating the cost of their goods/services?</p>
<p>Should goods/services include the cost of taxes when their prices are calculated?</p>
<p>PS To both those questions I’d answer yes.&#8221;</p>
<p>The answer IS yes, and it lies in pure capitalism; but the question should be:  In order to remain solvent, *MUST* businesses include the expense of taxes when their prices are calculated?  etc, etc.</p>
<p>Even Buster would sign off on that.</p>
<p> &#8212; George</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When the Numbers Just Don&#8217;t Work by Dick</title>
		<link>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/01/24/numbers/#comment-9498</link>
		<author>Dick</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/01/24/numbers/#comment-9498</guid>
		<description>Nah. On November 1st, 2009, at precisely 11:22:03 AM EST, 99.3% of Americans polled were in favor of President Obama.

Mr. Rich was obviously influenced by the 96 mph breeze recorded on Mount Mansfield today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah. On November 1st, 2009, at precisely 11:22:03 AM EST, 99.3% of Americans polled were in favor of President Obama.</p>
<p>Mr. Rich was obviously influenced by the 96 mph breeze recorded on Mount Mansfield today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When the Numbers Just Don&#8217;t Work by gekko</title>
		<link>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/01/24/numbers/#comment-9497</link>
		<author>gekko</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/01/24/numbers/#comment-9497</guid>
		<description>Maybe Rich meant "still breathing," which would  narrow it down a smidge.  Or maybe he meant "of those polled on November 1st, 2009, at precisely 11:22:03 AM"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Rich meant &#8220;still breathing,&#8221; which would  narrow it down a smidge.  Or maybe he meant &#8220;of those polled on November 1st, 2009, at precisely 11:22:03 AM&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maybe Yes, Maybe No by Heather Denkmire</title>
		<link>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/01/18/yes-no/#comment-9249</link>
		<author>Heather Denkmire</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 03:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/01/18/yes-no/#comment-9249</guid>
		<description>The question is problematic, Dick. It's just not a yes or no question, at least not how I'm reading it. Or, rather, I would *have* to say "no" but only because the question doesn't seem a valid one. So, saying "no" would seem wrong, too.

See why it's hard to answer yes or no? It's not a case of waffling, it's a case of the question being lousy. If nothing else, the tone is loaded with a clear bias towards a "no" answer. "Make their customers pay" is a phrase that would make most people cringe a bit.

I'll give you a couple yes or no versions:

Should businesses include the expense of taxes when calculating the cost of their goods/services?

Should goods/services include the cost of taxes when their prices are calculated?


PS To both those questions I'd answer yes.

PPS I'm not a Democrat, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is problematic, Dick. It&#8217;s just not a yes or no question, at least not how I&#8217;m reading it. Or, rather, I would *have* to say &#8220;no&#8221; but only because the question doesn&#8217;t seem a valid one. So, saying &#8220;no&#8221; would seem wrong, too.</p>
<p>See why it&#8217;s hard to answer yes or no? It&#8217;s not a case of waffling, it&#8217;s a case of the question being lousy. If nothing else, the tone is loaded with a clear bias towards a &#8220;no&#8221; answer. &#8220;Make their customers pay&#8221; is a phrase that would make most people cringe a bit.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll give you a couple yes or no versions:</p>
<p>Should businesses include the expense of taxes when calculating the cost of their goods/services?</p>
<p>Should goods/services include the cost of taxes when their prices are calculated?</p>
<p>PS To both those questions I&#8217;d answer yes.</p>
<p>PPS I&#8217;m not a Democrat, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Salvo after Salvo by Geroge Poleczech</title>
		<link>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/01/04/explosive/#comment-9193</link>
		<author>Geroge Poleczech</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 02:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/01/04/explosive/#comment-9193</guid>
		<description>I love tourist satire -- even when I don't understand it.  Say, did you ever hear the joke about the guy from Russia whose house right near the Poland and Russian borders.  One day the surveyors came along and told him he was 25 meters inside the border of Poland.  He said, "Thank God!  Now I won't have to put up with those horrible Russian winters."

Change it to Muslim and Christian and I think it will get laughs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love tourist satire &#8212; even when I don&#8217;t understand it.  Say, did you ever hear the joke about the guy from Russia whose house right near the Poland and Russian borders.  One day the surveyors came along and told him he was 25 meters inside the border of Poland.  He said, &#8220;Thank God!  Now I won&#8217;t have to put up with those horrible Russian winters.&#8221;</p>
<p>Change it to Muslim and Christian and I think it will get laughs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Salvo after Salvo by gekko</title>
		<link>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/01/04/explosive/#comment-9133</link>
		<author>gekko</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/01/04/explosive/#comment-9133</guid>
		<description> Ohhhhhhhhh Rob! 

They don't exist, dear. That's the point. There are none. So the lefty-loon outcry about how it's just awful sooooo much attention in the MSM is focused on the Muslims being turrists but not paying attention to other people being turrists yadda yadda.

Geddit now?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohhhhhhhhh Rob! </p>
<p>They don&#8217;t exist, dear. That&#8217;s the point. There are none. So the lefty-loon outcry about how it&#8217;s just awful sooooo much attention in the MSM is focused on the Muslims being turrists but not paying attention to other people being turrists yadda yadda.</p>
<p>Geddit now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Salvo after Salvo by Geroge Poleczech</title>
		<link>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/01/04/explosive/#comment-9123</link>
		<author>Geroge Poleczech</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/01/04/explosive/#comment-9123</guid>
		<description>" (Somehow the MSM overlooked the hundreds of Christians who blew themselves up to terrorize thousands of their neighbors, many of whom would also be, well, Christians.) "

I'm assuming this is seasonal satire.

 -- George</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; (Somehow the MSM overlooked the hundreds of Christians who blew themselves up to terrorize thousands of their neighbors, many of whom would also be, well, Christians.) &#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m assuming this is seasonal satire.</p>
<p> &#8212; George</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Salvo after Salvo by Dick</title>
		<link>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/01/04/explosive/#comment-8892</link>
		<author>Dick</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.dickharper.com/2010/01/04/explosive/#comment-8892</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
Abraham Lincoln wrote, &lt;i&gt;"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Step one is to limit politicians to two terms:
one term in office and one term in jail...

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Abraham Lincoln wrote, <i>&#8220;We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.&#8221;</i>
</p></blockquote>
<p>Step one is to limit politicians to two terms:<br />
one term in office and one term in jail&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Change We Can Believe In! by George Poleczech</title>
		<link>http://blog.dickharper.com/2009/12/28/believe/#comment-8772</link>
		<author>George Poleczech</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 02:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.dickharper.com/2009/12/28/believe/#comment-8772</guid>
		<description>George writes:

A clever wordsmith once said: "The more things change, the more they stay the same."  So, with that, I am happy to report that the US Postal Service (aka the Post Office) has not changed.  I say that because a friend mailed a Priority Mail parcel to me two weeks ago -- which he had the foresight to insure -- and it has yet to arrive.  However, ten days ago I ordered a tool from an online organization, and three days later a large brown man wearing ill-fitting brown pants drove up in a big brown truck and handed it to me over the gate.  I hope UPS never changes colors.

I see where the Fed has just pumped another three billion greenies into GMAC, which I assume will keep afloat the no-finance-charge deal that came with one of their 2009's.  

(the odd thing about that transaction is that I offered to finance it through my own bank, but the dealership said it preferred to use its own financing arm -- which was BTW, the Federal Government, aka tax dollars.  They even let me dicker down another $400 if I would close the deal.)

Apparently there is profit in giving away other people's money.

 -- George</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George writes:</p>
<p>A clever wordsmith once said: &#8220;The more things change, the more they stay the same.&#8221;  So, with that, I am happy to report that the US Postal Service (aka the Post Office) has not changed.  I say that because a friend mailed a Priority Mail parcel to me two weeks ago &#8212; which he had the foresight to insure &#8212; and it has yet to arrive.  However, ten days ago I ordered a tool from an online organization, and three days later a large brown man wearing ill-fitting brown pants drove up in a big brown truck and handed it to me over the gate.  I hope UPS never changes colors.</p>
<p>I see where the Fed has just pumped another three billion greenies into GMAC, which I assume will keep afloat the no-finance-charge deal that came with one of their 2009&#8217;s.  </p>
<p>(the odd thing about that transaction is that I offered to finance it through my own bank, but the dealership said it preferred to use its own financing arm &#8212; which was BTW, the Federal Government, aka tax dollars.  They even let me dicker down another $400 if I would close the deal.)</p>
<p>Apparently there is profit in giving away other people&#8217;s money.</p>
<p> &#8212; George</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Change We Can Believe In! by Rufus</title>
		<link>http://blog.dickharper.com/2009/12/28/believe/#comment-8700</link>
		<author>Rufus</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 19:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.dickharper.com/2009/12/28/believe/#comment-8700</guid>
		<description>I hope you are kidding about the move to 15% EtOH in gasoline, not to mention the lying claim that it would INCREASE fuel economy. I have never heard ANY claim that ANY car gets better fuel economy running gasoline diluted with EtOH... and my personal experience is that you get 5-10% LESS fuel economy with 10% EtOH in your gasoline. I will be REALLY PISSED if I lose another 5%!!!!
I.HAVE.HAD.ENOUGH.OF.THIS.BULLSHIT!!!!! 
Rufus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you are kidding about the move to 15% EtOH in gasoline, not to mention the lying claim that it would INCREASE fuel economy. I have never heard ANY claim that ANY car gets better fuel economy running gasoline diluted with EtOH&#8230; and my personal experience is that you get 5-10% LESS fuel economy with 10% EtOH in your gasoline. I will be REALLY PISSED if I lose another 5%!!!!<br />
I.HAVE.HAD.ENOUGH.OF.THIS.BULLSHIT!!!!!<br />
Rufus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on They Got the Gold Mine (We Got the Shaft) by Dick</title>
		<link>http://blog.dickharper.com/2009/12/24/shafted/#comment-8636</link>
		<author>Dick</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 19:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.dickharper.com/2009/12/24/shafted/#comment-8636</guid>
		<description>&gt; &lt;em&gt;Throw the bums out.&lt;/em&gt;

Where have I heard that before?

Note that the only $$$ I referenced were those promulgated by the CBO. There are other dollars not in the CBO report (the coming land grab at the rest of the TWO TRILLION total dollars of health care spending the Demorats deny will happen come to mind) but the CBO is all the news mentioned in this report.

I hope the CBO is, in fact, neutral. At worst, I hope it is the same as the EPA fuel economy standards: wrong but equally wrong for all the players.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> <em>Throw the bums out.</em></p>
<p>Where have I heard that before?</p>
<p>Note that the only $$$ I referenced were those promulgated by the CBO. There are other dollars not in the CBO report (the coming land grab at the rest of the TWO TRILLION total dollars of health care spending the Demorats deny will happen come to mind) but the CBO is all the news mentioned in this report.</p>
<p>I hope the CBO is, in fact, neutral. At worst, I hope it is the same as the EPA fuel economy standards: wrong but equally wrong for all the players.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on They Got the Gold Mine (We Got the Shaft) by Bob Post</title>
		<link>http://blog.dickharper.com/2009/12/24/shafted/#comment-8635</link>
		<author>Bob Post</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 19:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.dickharper.com/2009/12/24/shafted/#comment-8635</guid>
		<description>Worse... they cooked the books, they KNOW they cooked the books, they know WE KNEW they cooked the books. (Medicare "savings" money was spent TWICE in the legislation, apparently.)

But they passed it anyway.

THROW THE BUMS OUT. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worse&#8230; they cooked the books, they KNOW they cooked the books, they know WE KNEW they cooked the books. (Medicare &#8220;savings&#8221; money was spent TWICE in the legislation, apparently.)</p>
<p>But they passed it anyway.</p>
<p>THROW THE BUMS OUT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Party Hearty by Dick</title>
		<link>http://blog.dickharper.com/2009/12/22/party/#comment-8613</link>
		<author>Dick</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.dickharper.com/2009/12/22/party/#comment-8613</guid>
		<description>The airlines carry foxes? What would PETA think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The airlines carry foxes? What would PETA think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Party Hearty by George Poleczech</title>
		<link>http://blog.dickharper.com/2009/12/22/party/#comment-8612</link>
		<author>George Poleczech</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.dickharper.com/2009/12/22/party/#comment-8612</guid>
		<description>George agrees.

The airline defaults on its schedule promise, the FAA collects twelve millions dollars, and the passenger gets zilch.  -- or mebbe a voucher for future use.

The FAA shares the money with the general fund, Michelle Obama uses it to go to Paris, Hillary uses it to bribe developing nations in Copenhagen, and Homeland Security uses it to buy bullets.

Meanwhile, the airline looks at its bottom line and raises fares to cover its fox pass.  

 -- George</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George agrees.</p>
<p>The airline defaults on its schedule promise, the FAA collects twelve millions dollars, and the passenger gets zilch.  &#8212; or mebbe a voucher for future use.</p>
<p>The FAA shares the money with the general fund, Michelle Obama uses it to go to Paris, Hillary uses it to bribe developing nations in Copenhagen, and Homeland Security uses it to buy bullets.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the airline looks at its bottom line and raises fares to cover its fox pass.  </p>
<p> &#8212; George</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
