You are currently browsing the archives for the Newspaper "Science" category.
- About Me (1)
- Banking (2)
- Big Thoughts (15)
- Books (1)
- Business (13)
- Cars (2)
- Charity (1)
- Death (1)
- Dick's Desserts (3)
- Dick's Dumps (10)
- Extras! (4)
- Geekery (2)
- Grumpery (8)
- Holidays (1)
- Licensing (2)
- Lusty Links (1)
- Marketing (4)
- Media (8)
- Newspaper "Science" (2)
- PC (7)
- Photography (2)
- Politics (20)
- Quickies (10)
- Random Access (34)
- Science (not-so-real) (2)
- Science (real) (3)
- Seasonal (2)
- Society (8)
- Sociology (3)
- Unbelievable (1)
- Welcome (1)
- September 1. 2008: Throw Da Bums Out, IV
- August 25. 2008: Throw Da Bums Out, III
- August 20. 2008: What? Is He Nuts?
- August 18. 2008: Dewey Wins!
- August 11. 2008: Throw Da Bums Out, II
- August 4. 2008: Spinning the Entire Planet
- July 28. 2008: Throw Da Bums Out, I
- July 21. 2008: Some Assembly Required
- July 19. 2008: 60-Cubed ... Cap Cancer!
- July 14. 2008: Not Writing
alpha
Arts
Blogroll
Business
Photography
Tech Stuff
Ze Rest
Archive for the Newspaper "Science" Category
Hoofbeats
June 23. 2008 by Dick.
The End is nigh. The hoofbeats of the Four Horsemen have sounded. I am about to agree with Gary Trudeau. A couple-three years ago, his Doonesbury™ strip introduced Dr. Nathan Null, the Situational Science Adviser™. Here’s an excerpt from that strip:
Young Republican College Kid: “Drat! These pesky scientific facts won’t line up behind my beliefs!”
Situational Science Adviser: “Then Challenge them, Stewie!”
—–
SSA: “Situational Science is about respecting both sides of a scientific argument, not just the one supported by the facts!”
—–
SSA: “That’s why I always teach the controversy like the Evolution Controversy or the Global Warming controversy …
—–
YRCC: “You’re right, Situational Scienceman–I’ll never trust science again! “It’s just too controversial!”
SSA: “Stewie gets it now, folks! Do you?”
Trudeau likes to pound the Bush administration (ya think) but there is a similar effort going on the Far Green camps to use science to forestall and obfuscate rather than simply to report.
Once upon a time I thought this wasn’t a wholesale attempt to discredit science, merely a concerted effort to ramp up tiny observations into generalized Truths to serve their agenda. After all, we are told the Far Right agenda tries to use common folk as cannon or environmental fodder so, situationally, the Far Green agenda must try to shut down one business segment after another.
That worries me, but not as much as what I now see as the wholesale drive to gain power over every facet of your life and mine. How? By discrediting science whenever it appears in public. It has been going on for years.
Big Tobacco tried mightily to discredit Dr. Koop as a poopyhead.
Natural Life Magazine tried mightily to discredit childhood vaccinations.
The Far Right tried mightily to discredit Evolution for 80 years.
Trudeau’s Situational Science Adviser pushed the pesticides controversy, the coal slurry controversy, the Everglades controversy, the acid rain controversy, the mercury controversy, and more.
I know very little about mercury other than its toxicity and ubiquity. And its distance from the Sun. I did read that if you lose a single mercury filling in a ten-acre pond, the EPA would have to ban all fishing, swimming, bathing, and boating in that pond. Makes you wonder why we still have “silver” fillings–or why Al Gore pushes mercury-laden fluorescent light bulbs–innt.
Now, of course, everything from the unnaturally high snowfall in the winter of 2007-08 to the unnatural temperature rise of the Atlantic Ocean is caused by Global Warming, and all a result of Carbon Dioxide.
Heh.
Anybody want to guess the agenda here?
It’s almost the same as mine.
I want you to read this, decide I am brilliant, and do what I tell you is right.
The Far Green wants you decide they are brilliant and do what they tell you is right. But they want more. The Far Green wants to force you and you and you to do what they tell you is right And they are developing the tools to enforce their whims.
One of my correspondents related a story from the historical times after the Tet Offensive when gasoline cost 40 cents per gallon. His friend, a Quaker, had received Conscientious Objector status and was assigned to a group called “Environment!” After working there several months, he said “These guys don’t care a bit about the environment. This is all about power… We, the great and stupid unwashed, needed to be doing what the folks at “Environment!” said we should be doing.”
That was more than 35 years ago.
I think the group Environment! has joined the Extinct Species list but other Far Green groups are growing stronger.
Today their tools include taxes, criminal penalties, and news attacks on science.
Our Quaker friend said then that “if the environmental movement could define Carbon Dioxide as a pollutant, they would have total control.”
OK, everybody inhale … and hold.
Next up will be the ban on that other dangerous chemical, Dihydrogen Monoxide.
Your Carbon Footprint NASA and the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reported that the earth has entered a natural cooling phase that will last decades.
OTOH, Al and Tipper Gore’s Tennessee home uses about the same amount of electricity as a dozen or more average American homes or at least 156 Swahili villages. The Gore’s Nashville residence is just four times the size of those average American homes and the Gore’s consumption has jumped yet another 10% since their “energy-efficient” home renovations. Do as I say, not as I do, eh Al?
Posted in Society, Newspaper "Science", Science (not-so-real), Politics, Big Thoughts, Media, Random Access | No Comments »
Solar Energy a Tough Sell
June 9. 2008 by Dick.
The Miami Herald thinks solar power is a white elephant.
The old saying is, “If it bleeds, it leads.” I guess there wasn’t enough blood in South Florida yesterday.
Florida Power and Light, the principle utility here, has “scaled back grand plans for solar energy in Florida. Sunshine may be free, but generating energy from it is still a costly proposition,” according to a report by John Dorschner in the Miami Herald.
It surprised me to discover that “Florida gets much less direct sunlight than some other places.” The Herald continued that “What’s more, solar can be considerably more expensive than other forms of energy, experts say.”
For the record, FPL Group has desert solar plants and wind facilities throughout the western states. It is the largest U.S. producer of wind and solar power. FPL serves more than 4.4 million customer accounts across Florida.
“I haven’t seen anything yet that shows solar is right for Florida,” Jay Apt, executive director of the Carnegie Mellon Electricity Industry Center, concluded in the Herald.
Now for the real story.
“Backers of solar power insist that costs would drop quickly over time if solar gets support from utilities and politicians. But those who study energy economics are skeptical.”
I want to know where they found these experts. Consider this:
1959: “Only Jules Verne can get a man to the Moon”
1969: “That’s one small step for man …”1975: “The American automobile industry can’t possibly double the gas mileage on cars. Double? Are you crazy?”
1985: The Corporate Average Fuel Economy for cars reached 27.5 mpg.1992: “The sweet spot for desktop computers is $3,000″ (I paid $3,085 1992 dollars for an 80486-based Gateway 2000 in May of that year).
2002: Gateway sold Pentium 4-based desktops with Windows XP for under a grand (and some for half of that now).2006: Google founder Larry Page and Silicon Valley venture capitalists John Doerr and Vinod Khosla lit a public fire under solar power with a California ballot issue.
Computer chips and solar cells are, at the engineering level, pretty much the same thing.
“A solar cell is just a big specialized chip, so everything we’ve learned about making chips applies,” Paul Saffo, an associate engineering professor at Stanford University and a longtime observer of Silicon Valley said in the International Herald Trib earlier this year.
That tells us we can link Moore’s Law and solar technology. Moore’s law states that the number of transistors on an integrated circuit doubles every two years or so; its corollary is that prices plummet at around the same rate.
In 2006, Solaicx was one of dozens of Silicon Valley firms driving the then-$11 billion worldwide solar energy market. Applied Materials, the world’s largest manufacturer of chip-making equipment, began selling machinery that manufactures solar wafers that same year.
In 2006, SunPower founder Richard Swanson told CNN the solar industry was like the chip industry 30 years before. “It was an extremely fun and dynamic industry,” he said. “But unless you were in it, it was practically invisible until the IBM PC came out in 1981.”
That was a couple of years ago, long enough for the news to reach Florida by now.
So. Mr. Dorschner thinks solar power is a white elephant. I think the Herald and Mr. Dorschner should maybe do a little more research. And maybe, just maybe, they should report what the solar industry is doing that will change the numbers instead of looking to spill enough blood to kill it.
Filed under Bad Journalism and Far Green Angst.Sources:
http://www.miamiherald.com/457/story/561858.html
http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/02/17/technology/PING.php
http://money.cnn.com/2006/10/26/magazines/business2/solar_siliconvalley.biz2/index.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore’s_law
Posted in Newspaper "Science", Business, PC, Media, Dick's Dumps | 5 Comments »


