As Seen in the New York Times

Going negative. I subscribe to the New York Times’ own daily email story aggregator. The New York Times is (almost) the most often quoted journal of the liberal left. I put in the “almost” qualifier because anecdotally it’s a tossup between that venerable newspaper and the Daily Kos.

The New York TimesThe New York Times has had hundreds of stories about the health care act this year alone. Many were positive. Many pointed out its shortcomings. Stories about the flaws are coming faster. In fact, in the last month the newspaper has flogged Obamacare as its lead story nine times in the email notifications. Every one of those stories outlined growing problems in the law and its implementation.

Saturday, October 26, 2013
Today’s Headlines: Promised Fix for Health Site Could Squeeze Some Users

Thursday, November 7, 2013
Today’s Headlines: Despite Fumbles, Obama Defends Health Care Law

Saturday, November 9, 2013
Today’s Headlines: Cuts in Hospital Subsidies Threaten Safety-Net Care

Thursday, November 14, 2013
Today’s Headlines: With Enrollment Slow, Some Democrats Back Change in Health Law

Friday, November 15, 2013
Today’s Headlines: Obama Moves to Avert Cancellation of Insurance

Wednesday, November 20, 2013
Today’s Headlines: Perks Ease Way in Health Plans for Lawmakers

Thursday, November 28, 2013
Today’s Headlines: Online Health Law Sign-Up Is Delayed for Small Business

Friday, November 29, 2013
Today’s Headlines: Medicaid Growth Could Aggravate Doctor Shortage (Under Obamacare, a wave of additional Americans will soon be covered by Medicaid, a program that has struggled with a shortage of doctors willing to accept its low reimbursement rates and red tape.)

Saturday, November 30, 2013
Today’s Headlines: Health Care Site Rushing to Make Fixes by Sunday

Those nine headlines — that’s thirty percent of the lead stories this month — here were uniformly negative. That’s telling us something.

 

And the Hits Just Keep on Coming…

Two more not so affordable parts of the Unaffordable Health Care Act:

1. You don’t qualify for a subsidy if your income is less than 100% of the Federal Poverty Level.

2. Likewise you don’t get a subsidy if your filing status is “married filing separately.” If you’re married, your tax filing status must be “married filing jointly” in order to qualify for a subsidy.

“So, the poor folk this is designed to cover can’t afford it?”

$11,490. That’s the 2013 Federal Poverty Guideline for one individual living anywhere in the 48 Contiguous States and the District of Columbia.
$11,491. That’s the minimum one individual living anywhere in the 48 Contiguous States and the District of Columbia can earn to qualify for an Obamacare subsidy
25,273,000. That’s the number of individuals living anywhere in the 48 Contiguous States and the District of Columbia who earn less than $11,490.
25,273,000. That’s the number of individuals living anywhere in the 48 Contiguous States and the District of Columbia who don’t qualify for Obamacare premium tax credits or cost-sharing subsidies.

That’s right, Pookie, if you are the poorest of the poor, you don’t get premium tax credits or cost-sharing subsidies. [Note to those who are counting, some but not all of those 25,273,000 do qualify for Medicaid.]

“And if you and your spouse don’t live together, you’re basically screwed.”

About 2,408,000 people filed separate returns in 2009, the most recent year the IRS has published. About 1,811,779 (One million, eight hundred eleven thousand, seven hundred seventy-nine) of those reported less that $49,960 in income, the cut-off for individual subsidies. One point eight million people left out by the Unaffordable Care Act.

Well, Pookie, you might not be getting screwed but, yeah, you are.


If you support Obamacare, this is what your crutch hath wrought.


Pogo: We Have Met the Enemy
 

Obamacare, the Good, the Bad, and the Wugly

The Good:
“I ventured into the ACA minefield,” my friend Fanny Guay said. “I found I can get ‘gold premium’ coverage for about what I am paying now, thanks to the subsidy.”

Enola “Fanny” Guay’s parents joined the back-to-the-land movement in Vermont at the Nearings old farm house, far from big government and rampant consumerism. Ms. Guay’s friends are now the power brokers and consumers of Montpelier but she just lost her job with a small heating assistance NGO when they lost their outreach contract with the University. I’ve known her for nearly 50 years; she was pro-Cheryl Rivers in Vermont years ago and is pro-Obamacare now.

The Bad:
The real subsidy gotcha comes when Ms. Guay discovers that her subsidy isn’t a guarantee; it is an early refund of an income tax credit. A guarantee on Obamacare that isn’t, well, guaranteed? Imagine that.

Ms. Guay hopes to find a new job next year but says, “I figured the cost on my unemployment and some part-time. I hope that’s not what really happens.”

The “subsidy” will bite many, many people who calculate it based either on a low 2012 tax return or on a calculation like Ms. Guay’s and then end up with an increase in taxable income when they file their 2014 returns.

Imagine you earned $20,000 this year. Now imagine that your $20,000 income gets bumped to $50,000 by a windfall — it could be capital gain from a stock sale, a temporary consulting job, or a gambling win.

Warning! Real Data Ahead! ACA Supporters please stop reading here!
I ran those numbers at thehealthsherpa.com and discovered that the Gold plan Ms. Guay found might have a $981.26 base monthly premium but would cost the $20K earner just $321.53 per month thanks to a $659.73 subsidy. Unfortunately, with the windfall, that single insured person would have an unexpected “extra” tax bill of $7,916.76 due April 15, 2015, because the monthly subsidy on her $50 grand income drops to $0!

Kaiser Permanente says “In determining eligibility for exchange subsidies, income will be based on your attestation of your expected income in 2014 and will be verified by the exchange with documentation from your most recent tax return, with consideration of reasonable changes you expect. Exchanges will calculate enrollees’ household incomes using Modified Adjusted Gross Income, or MAGI. The MAGI calculation includes such income sources as wages, salary, foreign income, interest, dividends, and Social Security. MAGI calculation does not include income from gifts, inheritance and some other income sources are partially excluded.” More information on MAGI is available in a report from UC-Berkeley).

We are so screwed.

The Really Bad:
I compared what I have now to a “pretty good” similar plan with the closest deductible I could find.

Here’s the BlueOptions Everyday Health 1420 “Gold” plan on the Exchange. The Annual Deductible at $2,500 for me will be $50 more than I pay now. The co-insurance at 20% will be twice as much as my current coinsurance. The premium will be $1,084.67, or $653.67 per month more than my current premium.

My Current Blue Cross Blue Shield PlanOuch.

Here’s the Blue Cross Blue Shield plan plan I currently have. The plan Mr. Obama cancelled. The Annual Deductible at $2,450 for me is $50 less than the most comparable plan I can find under ACA. The co-insurance at 10% is *half* as much the coinsurance in the most comparable plan I can find under ACA. The premium is $431/month this year. The premium for the most comparable plan I can find under ACA will be $1,084.67 or 653.67 more than my current premium.

So the ACA that Mr. Obama guaranteed to let me keep my plan and guaranteed to save me money nearly triples my cost.

I am so screwed.

The Wugly:
Forbes analyzed the data. “If you’re healthy today, you will face steeper rate increases than these figures indicate. If you have a serious medical condition, however, and haven’t been able to find affordable health coverage as a result, you will do much better under Obamacare than the average person.”

“But Dick,” Ms. Guay said, “Now I have insurance that covers my pre-existing conditions and that I can afford!”

Yeppers.

Too bad you liberals had to cover Ms. Guay by making sure young men pay thousands extra at the point of a gun. They don’t vote anyway.

Too bad you liberals had to cover Ms. Guay by making sure I pay thousands extra to change a plan I did like. Also at the point of a gun. I don’t cast enough votes to matter, either.

Too bad you liberals had to cover Ms. Guay by giving the insurance companies yet another welfare check instead of fixing the problem.

Too bad you liberals won’t guarantee the “subsidy” so Ms. Guay can afford that plan past the next election.


… BREAKING NEWS #1 …

ACA forced carriers to cancel policies for 5 million people.
Meanwhile, Reuters reported that fewer than 27,000 people signed up for plans in October. About 79,391 more signed up through state-based exchanges, 30,000 in California alone.

100,000 sucked in … 5,000,000 shafted out.
Government in action, baby. Government in action.
 
… BREAKING NEWS #2 …

Mr. Obama reversed course on Thursday and said millions of Americans should be allowed to renew individual plans and small group plans like mine just cancelled under his watch.*

Like Gov. Shumlin before him, Mr. Obama didn’t ask the insurance companies. Insurance spokesmen and state insurance commissioners immediately warned that prices will skyrocket.
* If the insurers refuse to reinstate now, of course, now they bear all responsibility for the cancellations.
Right.

 

Worser

“The way this thing is going, it is a good thing we have a word like worser,” Bob Schieffer said yesterday morning on Face the Nation.

And the hits just keep on coming.

Lies.

“If the website doesn’t work, nothing else matters,” Barack Obama, 2010.

The Washington Post reports that in 2010 a pointed memo warned Mr. Obama’s top economic aides that no one in the administration was “up to the task” of constructing the insurance exchange and all the other intricacies of translating the 2,000-page Unaffordable Care Act into practice. The Washington Post. Not the Washington Times. Not the WashingtonExaminer.com. The Washington Post.

Didn’t matter.

“They were running the biggest start-up in the world, and they didn’t have anyone who had run a start-up, or even run a business,” said Harvard’s David Cutler, a health adviser to Mr. Obama’s 2008 campaign.

And the hits just keep on coming.

Damned lies.

“If you like your plan, you can keep your plan,” Barack Obama, 23 times from 2008 through 2010, and again in 2011. And again in 2012.

Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-CA) may have rolled out the official Doublespeak: “As I understand it, you can keep it up to the time the bill was enacted, then after that it’s a different story. I think that part of it, if true, was never made clear.” Your liberal friends will be quoting this now.

And the hits just keep on coming.

Statistics.

It’s not even the biggest startup. Amazon.com attracts about 65 million customers every month. Healthcare.gov must handle the 15 million people who buy their health insurance on the individual market. About 2.7 million of them tried in the first few days, or about half what Amazon handles each and every day during the Christmas season.

I use amazon.com and find it easy and intuitive. And the widgets I buy arrive in a truck 5 to 8 days later. I’ve tried to use healthcare.gov several times. It ain’t easy or intuitive and I still don’t have any idea of what policy I’ll have 58 days from now when my current policy evaporates.

And the hits just keep on coming.

I'm from the Government

Whether the website works isn’t the problem. The website is symptomatic of the problem.

They didn’t have anyone who had run a start-up, or even run a business.

And that, in a nutshell, is the problem. My liberal friends devoutly believe that you don’t actually need to know anything to run a business. Or, apparently, to run a government.

“It’s very hard to think of a situation where the people best at getting legislation passed are best at implementing it. They are a different set of skills,” Dr. Cutler said.

That’s our choice. Do we trust a government that trains for disaster, then rolls out FEMA; that has the greatest web gurus in the world, then gets caught spying on Angela Merkel; that has 3-1/2 years to build a Blue Cross website, then rolls out Ms. Feinstein’s sorry excuses? Do we trust that government to stitch our wounds and mend our broken bones?

My liberal friends are devout. And wrong.

And the hits just keep on coming.

 

We Don’t Need No Steenking Details — Book Them Orders

A liberal friend is impassioned about how she finally will get insurance January 1.

I’m glad she was able to get a plan, glad that the combination of premium and subsidy (actually a credit against next year’s taxes as in “many people who apply will qualify for reduced costs through tax credits that are automatically applied to monthly premiums”). I hope her carrier comes through rather than dumping her, a problem reported by CBS News last night.

Premiums for 38 Plans from healthcare.gov
I also hope she was able to find enough info about the plan she chose to know what coverage she got. See, this chart I’ve printed from healthcare.gov is pretty much all the info healthcare.gov is giving us; what I see is that monthly premiums for the dozen or so “bronze” plans, f’rex, range from $413.66 to at least $548.64. The five “platinum” plans range from $721.56 to $782.63.

What’s a “bronze plan”? How much does a “gold plan” pay for what service? What’s this “Catastrophic plan” that suddenly appeared for about the same premium? Nowhere did healthcare.gov tell me what a bronze plan actually covers or why there is a difference between all the different platinums. Here in South Puffin all those platinum plans are offered by Blue Cross and only Blue Cross. How can there be a dozen different plans at a dozen different premiums that all offer the same coverage?

At least Mr. Obama promised us he’ll fix the website!

Shopping for a Medicare Advantage plan for SWMBO was a cakewalk by comparison.