Gouged

First, do no harm.

I met a fellow at the drug store counter the other day (we’ll call him “Bob” so he remains completely anonymous). Bob told me his insurance company denied renewing the 30 mg Prevacid™ prescription he’s taken for years. A little research shows that the FDA approved 15 mg Prevacid™ for Over-the-Counter sales. Bob thinks he can remind Aetna that “the FDA decided you still need an Rx for the 30 mg.”

Mortar and PestleBob is, as we say in Big Pharma, scrogged. Oh, he can buy and take two of the 15 mg pills and he will, in the short term, but that is exactly the same as taking the 30mg which the FDA says you need the prescription for.

“Someone got stupid or cute,” he added.

We’ve all heard of Martin Shkreli, even if we don’t remember his name. The then-new CEO of Turing Pharmaceuticals acquired rights to make Daraprim™, an HIV and cancer drug that has been on the market since 1953 (it is a sole-source medication for toxoplasmosis that is frequently used to treat a life-threatening parasitic infection in patients with compromised immune systems). Turing raised the price from $13.50 to $750 per pill; Sen. Bob Casey (D-PA) called that move “pure evil.” Mr. Shkreli was arrested in December on securities fraud charges.

The Burlington Free Press reports that Bob and Deborah Messing of Montpelier are in the same boat. “She’s on Orencia™ … for rheumatoid arthritis. He recently finished a course of Harvoni™ … to treat hepatitis C.

“Both drugs are expensive. Harvoni™ lists at $1,125 per pill, or $94,500 for a 12-week course of treatment. Orencia’s list price tops $3,000 a month.”

Meanwhile, tens of millions of Americans use beta-blockers to treat hypertension and other heart ailments. My grandmother died in 1953, after living as an invalid with high blood pressure for years. Daraprim™ wouldn’t have helped her but drugs like Inderal™ would have. If she could have afforderd it. Pronethalol™, the first ß adrenergic receptor antagonist, was introduced in 1962 to treat angina pectoris. Propranolol was launched under the trade name Inderal™ in 1965. Corgard™ (generic name: nadolol) came along a few years later. We call them beta-blockers.

Bob’s wife Jean takes nadolol every day and her blood pressure is well controlled. It’s one of those miracle drugs that was on the Walmart $4 list ($10 for a 90-day supply). Unfortunately, the price of generic nadolol skyrocketed after a supposed “shortage” in 2013 — it was actually cheaper to buy the branded Corgard™.

Found on the Interwebs: “This bull$%!# is the game the manufacturers and distributors play. They create a shortage then raise the price through the roof. This one is unforgivable. It’s an old drug and shouldn’t cost more then it used to.”

Drugs.com shows the current price for 90 tablets is $201.38 or $2.24 per pill. Intriguingly, their best price is $0.88 per pill for 30 tablets. “Prices are for cash paying customers only and are not valid with insurance plans.”

Jean called one of the generic nadolol manufacturers and was told there was absolutely no shortage. They didn’t explain the price hike, though.

I can.

Oh, there has been plenty of finger pointing. Pfizer, the world’s largest drug maker and the manufacturer of Corgard™, paid $68 billion for rival Wyeth back in 2009. Even with the Wyeth deal Pfizer has product, patent, and no-drugs-in-the-pipeline problems. “That cost isn’t it, though. It’s the distributors.” “Oh, no, the retailers did it.” “Not me! I barely make the rent.” “Medicare and Medicaid and the VA can’t negotiate better prices under federal law.” And so on. For the record, Pfizer’s Wyeth buyout led to massive R&D cuts and weak productivity. No wonder prices went up.

There’s a bigger issue.

I have no more idea what Corgard™ or Prevacid™ really costs Bob than I do what a quick appendectomy would set back my granddaughter. Neither does the doc who prescribes the drug or cuts on her tummy. And, “for people of the Messings’ modest income, big manufacturers’ discounts and state assistance make their costs manageable.”

See, we don’t actually pay for any of them ourselves. Except for Bob who got scrogged.

We’ve gone from trading our own hard-earned, multi-colored greenbacks (or a chicken) for medical care to trading a get-out-of-jail-free card for it.

I bought a truck. I knew exactly what it cost before I closed the deal.
I bought a television. I knew its price precisely before I clicked BUY.
I bought a pound of ground beef. I knew exactly what it cost because it was right there on the label.
On the other hand…
Our doc prescribed Keflex when SWMBO had a strep throat. “How much will this cost?” I asked. He had no idea. “Your insurance should cover it.”

Pharmacy CadeuceusWe have a fantasy that medical care is free, so no one pays attention to what it costs and that leaves the door open for the price of Corgard™ jumping by a factor of 20 and Daraprim by 55 times.

Last month, the Vermont state legislature passed S.216, a bill that requires drug companies to explain price increases. The bill has the state health board list just 15 prescription drugs with dramatic price increases and would require the drug companies “to provide justification for the increase in the price of the drug” to the state Attorney General.

35 states have made some forms of price-gouging a crime.

It’s a start.

 

Guest Post: Attacking the Judiciary

I just got an email from MoveOn.org, taking Judge Aaron Persky to task for giving Brock Allen a six month jail sentence in the Stanford rape case, and asking me to sign a petition demanding that the “Committee on Judicial Performance” remove the Judge Persky from the bench:

“Judge Aaron Persky’s failure to hold Brock Turner accountable for the rape and his dismissive comments at sentencing show that he cannot be trusted to dispense justice. He must be removed from the bench immediately.”

While anyone who wants to can post a petition on MoveOn’s website, I’m surprised that MoveOn has inserted themselves into this issue by actively promoting the petition.

The State of California Commission (not Committee) on Judicial Performance has authority only to investigate complaints of judicial misconduct. The petition not only fails to allege judicial misconduct, it fails to even allege judicial error

The petition’s allegation that the Judge failed to hold Brock Turner accountable is wrong on its face. Even the claim about “dismissive comments” is baseless–a casual reading of the Judge’s statements, as reported by legitimate media outlets, reflects his analysis of all the relevant factors as required by California sentencing guidelines.

It seems to come down to a bunch of people who’ve read social media posts on the case, and are outraged because… justice! (Beyond the petition at MoveOn, there’s one at Change.org calling for Judge Persky’s impeachment, and a website advocating his recall.)

What concerns me is that the people pushing for Judge Persky’s removal don’t consider the unintended consequences of that action. How is removing judges for rulings in abortion cases, LGBTQ civil rights cases, or tax cases any different from removing a judge for an unpopular ruling? If victim’s rights advocates can drive a social media campaign to remove a judge they don’t like, what’s to stop abortion foes, religious extremists, or billionaires from doing the same thing?

Over the last week or so, Donald Trump has been widely criticized for his racist attacks on Judge Curiel. Yet, is his demand that Curiel be removed from the Trump U case any different from social media demands that Persky be removed from the bench? Despite the former being blatantly driven by Trump’s personal self-interest, and the latter couched in cries for victim justice, they have the same goal: to subvert the judiciary.

The only important difference between the two is this: Trump’s attack on Judge Curiel has already failed, and backfired against him. The social media attack on Judge Persky may yet succeed, and result in long-term damaging consequences to our justice system.

Evan Yares

 

Dead Sea Salt Scrub

“Last year I got talked into purchasing a jar of authentic Dead Sea salt scrub,” my friend Liz Arden confessed at a potluck dinner the other night.

Greta Bruhl was entranced. “I read that Dead Sea salt outperforms Alba Botanica [a bath emollient] as a sunscreen,” she said. Greta is the daughter of my good friend, retired newspaper editor Lee Bruhl.

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble.
It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so.
–Mark Twain

Ashley Proctor brought a special new salt to the potluck. “It’s organic!” she said, happily.

Paul “Buster” Door, a former North Puffin car dealer and Democratic party official, says he can taste the difference.

<sigh>

Morton Salt GirlOrganic? Health benefits?

While it is true that a nice mineral coating on your skin does reflect sunlight, I couldn’t find any minerals in Alba Botanica Mineral Sunscreen. None. Alba Botanica proudly offers “100% vegetarian personal care products” that contain isopropyl palmitate, glyceryl stearate SE, steareth-2, dimethicone, trimethylsiloxysilicate, glyceryl stearate, stearic acid, methyl glyceth-20, cetyl phosphate, allantoin, phenoxyethanol, benzyl alcohol, and potassium sorbate. Not a mineral in sight. Potassium sorbate is the potassium salt of sorbic acid but it and allantoin are in there in minute quantities, probably to inhibit mold or repel mosquitoes.

A mineral is a “naturally occurring, homogeneous inorganic solid substance having a characteristic crystalline structure, color, and hardness.” Inorganic elements such as calcium, iron, potassium, sodium, and zinc are well known examples.

Organic and inorganic compounds form the basis for chemistry and it’s fairly easy to tell them apart. The primary difference between them is that organic compounds always contain carbon; most inorganic compounds don’t. Table sugar, ethanol, and cholesterol with its linked hydrocarbon rings are all organic. Salts, metals, salts, the battery in your smartphone, salts, and all substances except diamonds made from single elements are inorganic.

Maybe she meant it’s organic food! Organic foods are produced without the usual pesticides and fertilizers used in farming. Typically, organic food processing also doesn’t use radiation, industrial solvents, or synthetic food additives.

Organic Chemistry? Nupe. Common table or sea salt is Sodium Chloride with the chemical symbol NaCl. No carbon.

Organic Food? Nupe. It’s been a while since I was in a salt mine, so maybe things have changed but I’m pretty sure they don’t need pesticides, fertilizers, radiation, solvents, or food additives to pull rocks out of the ground or out of sea water.

People are sooooooooooooo gullible.

 

Generations

1944: 18-22 year olds stormed enemy beaches, parachuted behind enemy lines, charged into battle, looked death square in the eye, and heard the 88s whistle in their ears.

A Special Safe Zone for Your Protection

2016: 18-22 year olds (their grandchildren and great grandchildren) tormed the administration building to demand “safe zones” on college campuses to protect them from offensive words whistling in their fragile ears.

The Most Dangerous Place on Earth

Ruint, I tell you.